[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Muon-On-Request

To: Michael Barnes <barnes@triumf.ca>
Subject: Re: Muon-On-Request
From: Peter Kammel <kammel@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:38:37 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: 'Michael Barnes' <michael.barnes@triumf.ca>, Francoise Mulhauser <Francoise.Mulhauser@psi.ch>, Peter Winter <peter.winter@psi.ch>, Gary WAIT <WAIT@triumf.ca>
In-reply-to: <434F95B5.1030301@triumf.ca>

> 
> *Please remind me what operating conditions you would ideally like for the Muon-On-Request mode. Thanks.*
> 
Dear Mike, dear Gary,

Sorry, it took a day to think a bit more carefully about the
muon-on-request scheme. Attached is a little note on this issue.
As far as I can tell (but others will check for loopholes) it looks
really promising.

Best regards

Peter

Attachment: more05n.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Muon-On-Request
  - From: Michael Barnes <barnes@triumf.ca>

References:
- Re: Muon-On-Request
  - From: Michael Barnes <barnes@triumf.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: [SPAM] Re: MuCap
Next by Date: Re: a few thoughts on more
Previous by thread: Re: Muon-On-Request
Next by thread: Re: Muon-On-Request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread