Re: [SPAM] Re: MuCap

[Peter Kammel <kammel@one.npl.uiuc.edu>]

Dear Peter,

I'll call you over the weekend. Could you please make a little drawing of 
the top view with the two blocks. As mentioned, we are hesitant to have 
one support block without holes, two seem worse. But maybe I misunderstand
this.

Best regards

Peter

On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, Peter Winter wrote:

> The dimensions from the elog posting are okay.
>
>> Additional blocks above the rollers are much more realistic.
> I think I misunderstood this sentence from your email and thought you propose 
> another way to do it. But reading the elog I get the impression that we will 
> do it as proposed in the scheme I send you, so, we will have longer BLUE 
> screws, right?. In that case just forget my statement in the last email 
> concerning the grey screws.
>
> With respect to the lower bolts the idea is to have actually two seperate 
> blocks per roller! So instead of one block with height 60mm and dimensions of 
> a bit more than 5.19 x 6.5 inches, we will have two blocks with each 60mm 
> high, a bit more than 5.19 inches long and around 2 inches broad. That's why 
> in the front view of my scheme there are two separate red rectangles. In the 
> middle part there is nothing so that the lower bolts will not disturb at all 
> and milling would not be necessary. If this explanation is too complicated, 
> we might also discuss that via phone. I'll be available on 4786 nearly the 
> whole weekend.
> Peter
>

Peter Kammel  /  pkammel@uiuc.edu
Department of Physics, Loomis Laboratory
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801
Tel (217) 333-5424 / Fax (217) 333-1215