Re: epithermal oxygen (fwd)

[Bernhard Lauss <lauss@berkeley.edu>]

dear peter,

I will put that also in my note,
simply stated, if one
does not believe all the rates as they are
quoted, it is very easy to get a 50%
epithermal fraction even within this model
e.g. lam_r = 1.1 instad of 8.1 in your calculation.
and the paper itself quotes a range of lam_r = 7.2 - 11.2
to only fit their own measurement.
One can of course doubt that this model is valid for our
low concentrations plus other doubts.

       good luck in BNL

		Bernhard





*******************************************************************
Bernhard Lauss                 E-Mail: lauss@socrates.berkeley.edu
Physics Department
366 LeConte Hall
University of California @ Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720                             Tel: (510)-642 4057
United States                                  Fax: (510)-642 9811
*******************************************************************

On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Peter Kammel wrote:

> Dear Bernhard,
>
> Becuase of g-2 stress I could not follow the impurity
> discussion right now. Attached is my old estimate, as
> Steve asked me about it. I hope I did not make a
> mistake at the time.
>
> Regards
>
> Peter
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 05:39:59 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
> To: Francoise Mulhauser <francoise.mulhauser@unifr.ch>
> Subject: epithermal oxygen
>
> Dear Francoise,
>
> Attached is a simple estimate from your paper. Please
> check. Fortunately at low c we don't have significant
> epithermal troubles, it seems.
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter