next up previous
Next: Electronics Up: The Detector Previous: Design Details

Photomultiplier Tubes and Scintillator Selection

The choice of photomultiplier tube is motivated by the desire to find a fast tube with good gain and and minimum time jitter. The area to be readout sets the scale for the size of the photocathode. The cross sectional area of the edge of the inner scintillator tile is 6.35 cm2 which suggests a 28 mm (1-1/8 inch) diameter head-on type photomultiplier. A large variety exist at this size built by a number of commercial vendors. At the time of this submission, the final tube choice remains open and will be subject to an open bid process in the event that several PMTs meet the required specifications. However, it is useful to describe an affordable PMT which we are presently using for the 2 experiment which has passed many critical timing and gain tests related to our similar needs there. In 2 the average rate changes from early-to-late times by 105, and the initial rate can exceed a few MHz. In the µLan detector, the peak rate is nearly 100 times lower. Furthermore, in 2, an intense initial burst of particles due to pion contamination in the beam creates such a large light output in the detectors that the tubes have to be gated off for up to 20 $ \mu$s. This environment is particularly hostile for good timing and gain stability; our PMTs and custom bases have thus been subjected to a rather severe test and have performed quite well [21]. In this development, we have created test systems at BU and Illinois to measure rate and gain dependence of PMTs using LEDs and lasers.

An excellent candidate PMT presently in use by us is the Hamamatsu R6427. It is a 28 mm diameter 10-stage head-on tube with a gain exceeding 5  x  106 and a maximum quantum efficiency of approximately 25%. The 10-90% risetime is 1.7 ns and the transit time jitter for single photoelectrons has a standard deviation of about 200 ps. We have designed a base for this tube with a gating circuit. It will not be difficult to produce simpler ungated bases following this design, or to use the one offered by Hamamatsu as a package which already matches the tube. The cost of the tube, base and magnetic shielding which we have budgeted is $500 per unit. Over the next year we will test other tubes in order to find the best final product. Our main goals are fast risetime, low jitter, and short-term stability (burst mode) for the timing and gain, all within a moderate cost envelope.

The individual equilateral scintillator tiles of 6.35 mm and 3.175 mm thicknesses can be obtained either as large sheets from which we will do the cutting and polishing, or cut to form. In either case, the bulk cost of the tile represents a minor cost of the detector. We will make a final selection between the two fast-timing choices from Bicron [19], namely BC-404 and BC-418. Their main properties, along with those of the standard BC-408 bulk scintillator, are compared in table 2. The BC-418 has the shortest decay constant which we want for the best pulse-to-pulse separation.

Table 2: Selected specifications for comparison of Bicron bulk scintillators.
Specification BC-408 BC-404 BC-418
Decay constant (ns) 2.1 1.8 1.4
Relative light output 1.0 1.06 1.05
Attenuation length (cm) 380 160 100
Wavelength, Max (nm) 425 408 391


next up previous
Next: Electronics Up: The Detector Previous: Design Details
Gerco Onderwater
1999-05-25