Re: CIPANP2006 mucap proceedings

[Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>]

Dear Steven,
  Just a few points regarding the paper.
At the end of the first page, last paragraph, there is one line 
concerning the detector.  I am not sure if it goes here considering the 
immediate return to physics discussion.

Also, you mention the terms muon detectors and electron detectors.  
Maybe you could rephrase it to say something like: "Muon stops and 
electron decays are detected by a series of wire chambers to provide 
tracking information and fast scintillators to precisely measure the 
timing." 

Under muZ formation you say the mucap design eliminates impurity 
captures to a high level in the following ways:  Wall Stops, Transfers 
to Gas Impurity, Transfer to Deuterium, then Diffusion.
  The subject headings are the categories of potential pitfalls, not the 
"ways" that the mucap design eliminates them, so maybe the headings 
should change to the positive methods used: Wall Stops->Active Target , 
Transfers to Gas impurity -> Cryogenic Absorbers + in situ monitoring, 
Transfer... ->Deuterium Depleted Target .  Alternatively you could 
change the sentence to say  something like : " the following problems 
related to high z caputres are addressed by the mucap design", and leave 
the headings the same.

Since I am unsure about the target audience, please feel free to ignore 
if the comments/suggestions are not important.
Best Regards,
Brendan

Steven Clayton wrote:

>I have to upload my 3-page paper for the CIPANP2006
>conference proceedings no later than tomorrow (Friday).
>If you have a chance before tomorrow afternoon,
>please have a look at the attached document.
>
>Thanks,
>Steven
>  
>