[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: before I forget (fwd)
- To: Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: before I forget (fwd)
- From: Dan Chitwood <dchitwoo@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:30:55 -0500
- Cc: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0605121100440.17476@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0605121100440.17476@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)
Hi Brendan,
Take a look here http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/~dchitwoo/Analysis/May_05_06/
and the RunByRun talks. I think what Peter is talking about is the
effect on phi. The up/down transitions have been traced to the changing
of the EMC field orientation. I'm sorry I don't have better links for
you right now.
-- Dan
Peter Kammel wrote:
>
> Dear Dan,
>
> Could you recommend a link?
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 09:17:00 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>
> To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: Re: before I forget
>
> Hi Peter,
> You would prefer the magnet off to running the magnet with the opposite
> field? I think our mu+ run9 data set is mixed already. I'm not sure
> which effects you are speaking of, do you have a link to an elog or
> webpage from Dan on this topic?
> Regards,
> Brendan
>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I would propose to continue until Wednesday with Bernhard's magnet
>> on and then run one week with the magnet off. The motivation is that
>> Dan observed some strange effects in the MuLan data, when the
>> entrance field on the EMC was reversed which still need a
>> quantitative explanation. I would not expect any change in
>> MuCap, but better check.
>>
>> Let's discuss that in next Tuesday's telconf.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Peter
>>