[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: glitch in background of UIUC spectrum




> > Since the skimming interval
> > was apparently 40us not 35us, my first guess about the cause
> > of the bump must be wrong.
>
> Steve -- I just rechecked this.  You were correct.  The skim interval was
> in fact 35 microseconds, so your theory is not eliminated.

FYI, and to share what I told Steve this morning after the teleconference:
I looked at some of the Berkeley lifetime histograms (from different pre-
and post-skim analyses) and did not see any evidence of a bump like the
one Steve reports.

Tom