[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM] Re: MuCap
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: MuCap
- From: Peter Winter <peter.winter@psi.ch>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:38:53 +0200
- Cc: Steve Clayton <smclayto@uiuc.edu>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0510140942550.3289-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0510140942550.3289-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
Peter Kammel wrote:
>Additional blocks above the rollers are much more realistic. I will try to
>get the longer bolts so that Steve can bring them to PSI.
>
That's even easier, I'll propose it on Monday. But just to be sure that
I understood correctly: In your proposition, Peter, we need longer grey
screws in my scetch. Right?
For further course of action, I propose the following:
I'll ask Adrian Gnädiger on Monday to go for the second solution and to
prepare the additional blocks just in advance. Then on Tuesday if Steve
arrives with the bolts, he can have a look at the modification and
decide seperately if the change will be fine. If so, there is still
Tuesday and Wednesday to just mount all things. And if he finds a reason
not to do it now, we can use the prepared parts next year.
Peter