[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: telconf conflicts with MuLan
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: telconf conflicts with MuLan
- From: Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 13:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: analysis -- Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.berkeley.edu>, Steve Clayton <smclayto@uiuc.edu>, Tim Gorringe <gorringe@pa.uky.edu>, Fred Gray <fegray@socrates.berkeley.edu>, David Hertzog <hertzog@uiuc.edu>, Malte Hildebrandt <malte.hildebrandt@psi.ch>, Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>, Sara Knaack <sknaack@uiuc.edu>, Berhard Lauss <lauss@socrates.berkeley.edu>, Marat Vznuzdaev <marat@mail.pnpi.spb.ru>, Francoise Mulhauser <Francoise.Mulhauser@psi.ch>, Claude Petitjean <Claude.Petitjean@psi.ch>, "R. Prieels" <prieels@fynu.ucl.ac.be>, Peter Winter <peter.winter@psi.ch>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0605161517150.6455@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0605161517150.6455@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
> I had it wrong, wishful thinking :)
> The MuLan meeting starts already tomorrow. So I can't participate
> in the telconf. That does not mean there should not be a teleconf
> without me. I leave it to Steve and Tom to decide whether they want to
> schedule a telconf or not.
There is no pressing need (or, I imagine for most, much desire) for
another teleconference. I should just summarize the analysis status by
saying that Steve and I have found consistent eSC-only lifetime results,
and that the ePCs are now my primary source of concern. Given the wide
variation we observe in our fitted rates once the ePCs are used, perhaps
we should seriously consider using the eSC-only lifetimes for our final
results--i.e. the ePC1/ePC2/eSC lifetimes would only be used to inform the
deuterium extrapolation (via the concentration ratio).
Tom