[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Justification Response



Dear Michelle,

We have submitted a MRAC proposal for continuing our work
at NCSA, which has started so successfully with Steve Clayton.

Alas, we were not treated so well by the referees and I am
preparing a reply to ask for a better allocation. Craig has
helped us a lot in discussing technical issues. He has
all the info, including the referee reports.

Attached I send you our original proposal and my late night
draft for the reply. I have been out of the country at the
experiment a lot.

I don't want to ask for too much time from you to get into
this matter, you have already helped and advised us quite
a bit in the past. So I would just ask you to read the
reply, which should be largely self explanatory. Several
key issues depend on staging and I/O to the MSS, and we
would aks for your expert advice. Needless to say,
tactical comments are welcome as well.

I could call you tomorrow or visit you in the afternoon
or on Monday (we should submit on Monday).

In any case, many thanks for your efforts and best 
regards

Peter


Peter Kammel  /  pkammel@uiuc.edu
Department of Physics, Loomis Laboratory
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801 
Tel (217) 333-5424 / Fax (217) 333-1215   


Attachment: prop06.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Attachment: response06.doc
Description: MS-Word document