[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
elog236
- To: "Brendan Kiburg" <kiburg@uiuc.edu>, "Peter Winter" <peter.winter@psi.ch>, "Peter Kammel" <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: elog236
- From: "Francoise Mulhauser" <francoise.mulhauser@psi.ch>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 09:20:58 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=kGrmun9QW8jId0Q7xG6G4AaGOGxhI4BbJhQ/qZl3b+FyyE87YGdvpupepmZeQPZM9It6d/0mYERS3TV7ZcKhw+GLc7DL8YWvC1DGzAcNcBLN5MIr4JYMlEg+Cp5ksG0/MszJAyEo5zwKHPDFMRtU3j+du0MrvGSZqHdCapwfUM8=
- Sender: francoise.mulhauser@gmail.com
Dear Brendan and co,
I read your elog236 and am concern with the final and only possible action.
You probably are aware that putting both ePCs on the same Bertan model
means that a trip from one of them will trip the second chamber. This
is a nasty feature of the module. Additionally, I have seen some
tripping or disturbance on one channel when changing the current range
on the other channel. I hope you will be able to find another
solution in a near future!
Best regards
Francoise