[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
followup to mucap teleconference: Cd ratio vs. run group
- To: Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.berkeley.edu>, Bernhard Lauss <lauss@berkeley.edu>, Claude Petitjean <claude.petitjean@psi.ch>, Steven Clayton <smclayto@uiuc.edu>, Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>, Fred Gray <fegray@berkeley.edu>, Tim Gorringe <gorringe@pa.uky.edu>, David Hertzog <hertzog@uiuc.edu>, Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>, Malte Hildebrandt <malte.hildebrandt@psi.ch>, Rene Prieels <R.Prieels@fynu.ucl.ac.be>, Francoise Mulhauser <Francoise.Mulhauser@psi.ch>, Peter Winter <peter.winter@psi.ch>
- Subject: followup to mucap teleconference: Cd ratio vs. run group
- From: Steven Clayton <smclayto@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:59:43 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20060418144733.GA2692@npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <20060418071542.GA1021@npl.uiuc.edu> <20060418144733.GA2692@npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
As a followup to the discussion today, I made some plots of
the deuterium ratio (as calculated with the methods described
in my note) vs. run group. They are linked off of my analysis
page, or here is the complete URL:
http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/exp/mucapture/coll/mucap/smclayto/CdRatioVsRunGroup/ratio_vs_group.html
There is no clear trend in the plot of deuterium ratio vs. run group.
Steven
> >
> > I've posted an updated version of my MuCap note on mu-p
> > diffusion at
> > http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/exp/mucapture/coll/mucap/smclayto/mup_bcut_calcs.pdf
> > (usual mucap login/pw).