Two Cents Worth/ Gondola

[THOMAS CASE <tom.case@prodigy.net>]

Hi All,
  Thanks for the opportunity to look at the
results of all your hard work over the past
couple of years.
  I have a consulting project due Wednesday but
will try to join you briefly at the party if
I am far enough along tonight. (You don't need
to save me any food).
  In the mean time here is my 2 cents worth on
the Gondola effect etc.
  It seems that Tom's approach should work fine
if the MC is roughly tuned to match the real data:
Adjusting the mass and average scattering angles
from the support posts and the vessel wall separately.
  Getting the G. Effect right, verifies the diffusion
model and has the added benefit of fixing the
second order effect of diffusion along the beam
direction.  Tom's approach and Peter's seem about 
the same to me.  Off course it would be nice to
try both for comparison but maybe there is not
enough time.  It sounded like
the Al(Mg?) support was not in the MC's yet and that
certainly should be fixed.
  Minus the Gon. Effect the error bars looked quite
nice I thought.  I seems you are really homing in on
an answer and it also seems the G. Effect can tell
you what you need to know about diffusion if you 
use it to full advantage.
                        Good Luck,
                             Tom


--- Bernhard Lauss <lauss@berkeley.edu> wrote:

> 
> 
> Dear friends,
> 
> please find attached a tentative agenda
> for the Berkeley meeting.
> Any inputs and updates are welcome.
> 
> 		best regards
> 
>                          Bernhard
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
*******************************************************************
> Bernhard Lauss                 E-Mail:
> lauss@socrates.berkeley.edu
> Physics Department
> 366 LeConte Hall
> University of California @ Berkeley
> Berkeley, CA 94720                             Tel:
> (510)-642 4057
> United States                                  Fax:
> (510)-642 9811
>
*******************************************************************