[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: panic proceedings
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: panic proceedings
- From: Steven Clayton <smclayto@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:33:04 -0600
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0601250016160.20656-101000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0601250016160.20656-101000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
In the second to last sentence:
"...key techniques that promise to a tenfold reduction..."
"promise to" should be just "promise," and maybe this should
anyway be changed to the passive,
"...key techniques that are promising for a tenfold reduction..."
Steven