[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: panic proceedings
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: panic proceedings
- From: Steven Clayton <smclayto@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:15:20 -0600
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0601250016160.20656-101000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0601250016160.20656-101000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
There is a typo (missing verb) in the last sentence of the abstract:
"The new experiment should _be_ an unambiguous..."
Steven
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:20:41AM -0600, Peter Kammel wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I just patched together my PANIC contribution which is due tomorrow.
> Everything will sound familiar, but, if you have a chance, please
> proofread it and email corrections to me. The allocated space
> was exactly 3 pages.
>
> I will also proof it tomorrow.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Peter
>