[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mPC
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: mPC
- From: Frederick Gray <fegray@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 16:10:24 -0800
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0512012056010.9102-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0512012056010.9102-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
> Another puzzle is the difference between mSC and mSC*mPC.
> It is pretty dramatic for the mu+ kicked runs (around
> 23200). What's going on there? Is mPC not efficient?
> Or a timing problem?
Well, it appears that the muPC timing has shifted by 20 ns over the
last few weeks, so that we are now losing part of the distribution to the
timing cut. This will increase the muPC1 rate by 7.5%. However, that
does not yet completely account for the discrepancy.
-- Fred
-- Fred Gray / Visiting Postdoctoral Researcher --
-- Department of Physics / University of California, Berkeley --
-- fegray@berkeley.edu / phone 510-642-2438 / fax 510-642-9811 --