[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Back in action
- To: Gary D Wait <wait@triumf.ca>
- Subject: Re: Back in action
- From: Gary D Wait <wait@triumf.ca>
- Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 10:56:23 -0800
- Cc: kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu, Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>, Peter Winter <peter.winter@psi.ch>, Michael Barnes <barnes@triumf.ca>, Mulhauser Francoise <francoise.mulhauser@psi.ch>, hertzog@uiuc.edu, michael.barnes@triumf.ca, Robert M Carey <carey@bu.edu>, Anatoly Gafarov <anatoly@g2pc1.bu.edu>, rmcnabb@uiuc.edu, Claude.Petitjean@psi.ch
- In-reply-to: <439090D2.4010703@triumf.ca>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0512021037100.23689-100000@three.npl.uiuc.edu> <439090D2.4010703@triumf.ca>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
Hi ALL
If Mike is right about a short on the backplane ( I hope he is right) at
DN-13 then there is no need to send cards to me.
Regarding air filters, I recommend that none be installed on the doors.
Mike and I tried various air filters a few years ago and determined that
the air flow was severely restricted, even with a filter that was quite
open and porous.
Regards
Gary
Gary D Wait wrote:
> Brendan and Peter
> Nice work!!
> I am concerned about DN-13. I think the fiber optic cable might be
> intermittent and should be replaced so that you can run at full
> voltage with more confidence. Please send the cards that you replaced
> to my attention at TRIUMF and I will check them out.
>
> TRIUMF
> 4004 Wesbrook Mall
> Vancouver B.C., Canada
> V6T 5L8
>
> Regards
> Gary Wait
>
> Brendan Kiburg wrote:
>
>> Hello again, We have more good news to report. We recleaned the
>> fischer and made sure
>> it had silicon paste. We replaced DN-13 and the RED LED was working
>> again. The beamline produced an excellent vacuum in a very short
>> time (~4
>> hours) and so we were able to start testing the muon on request mode
>> around 4 pm. We have now verified that the kicker is working
>> properly in
>> vacuum, with the pickup signals as well as with our detectors.
>>
>> There is really every indication that we have resolved this issue and
>> restored the kicker to a working state. We are now taking production
>> kicked mu+ data only 1 shift after we removed the vacuum to begin
>> repairs,
>> so we are quite happy about that. We plan to monitor the kicker signals
>> and make occasional accesses to verify the LED status and display
>> voltages.
>>
>> Thanks again for all of the external support. Please feel free to
>> follow
>> any future developments on the kicker as well as the mucap experiment
>> via
>> our electronic logbook on http://kaon.physics.berkeley.edu:8080/run9 .
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Brendan and Peter
>>
>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Peter Kammel wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dear Peter, dear Brendan,
>>>
>>> Congratulations for your findings. I am very impressed how you
>>> worked out a thoughtful plan, communicated with the experts on every
>>> details and made the right decisions. That was not so easy, considering
>>> that you are already exhausted by your other run duties.
>>>
>>> Many thanks to all the remote experts for their enormous help and
>>> careful thinking up to 3AM. This was really excellent teamwork.
>>>
>>> I don't see why we would need the collimator for MuCap.
>>>
>>> Good luck
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2 Dec 2005, Brendan Kiburg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>> This morning we discussed with the hallendienst our plans. They
>>>> explained that due to time constraint, we should not first look in the
>>>> top/down access ports, but rather we should move or wait until
>>>> Monday. We
>>>> decided to move and they disconnected the kicker.
>>>>
>>>> As the upstream bellow was removed, the SU identified that the
>>>> collimator was no longer in position. He said that it was at
>>>> already at
>>>> an angle relative to vertical (~45 degrees), and that it fell
>>>> further when they removed the bellows.
>>>> Based on what the SU told us, we fully believe the collimator
>>>> was in electrical contact with the upstream deflector plate and the
>>>> beampipe at the time of opening. We remeasured the resistance
>>>> between the
>>>> fischer connector in HV1 and ground and obtained >20 MOhm , so the
>>>> short
>>>> appeared to be gone. At air, we reconnected the power and ground and
>>>> turned on HV2 as a control in the fixed frequency mode. We
>>>> then ramped up the voltage on HV1 and found no breakdown and we
>>>> were able
>>>> to achieve +9 kV on HV2 and -9 kV on HV1. We note that
>>>> there was no Red LED on card 13, but we concluded yesterday this is a
>>>> problem with the optical fiber and not a problem related to the
>>>> breakdown. This was our reasoning for stopping at 9 kV for the time
>>>> being.
>>>>
>>>> As a result of our findings, we believe there is clear evidence the
>>>> collimator was responsible for the breakdown. We have removed the
>>>> collimator, as there was damage to the nylon ends inserted in the set
>>>> screws. We made the working decision to return to vacuum without
>>>> inserting the collimator, but we have left open the option of
>>>> reinserting
>>>> it as early as next wednesday if we see significant evidence that
>>>> we need
>>>> it for beam quality.
>>>>
>>>> We are currently pumping the beamline, which will take on the
>>>> order of 8
>>>> hours. We can then verify that everything still works, and
>>>> continue with
>>>> our measurement program. If there are any further problems, we will
>>>> communicate them to all of you. We will send another email later
>>>> tonight
>>>> when we have verified the repair was succesful. Thanks for all the
>>>> efforts and communication; we appreciate it.
>>>>
>>>> With guarded optimism,
>>>>
>>>> Brendan and Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Peter Kammel / pkammel@uiuc.edu
>>> Department of Physics, Loomis Laboratory
>>> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
>>> 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801 Tel (217) 333-5424 / Fax
>>> (217) 333-1215
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>