Re: Monte Carlo Data

[Bernhard Lauss <lauss@berkeley.edu>]

Dear Brendan,

what we really would lke to see are the 3 following plots
where you take the difference of
i)
(lifetime bs r) divided by (lifetime vs m)   for cd = 1ppm
ii)
(lifetime bs r) divided by (lifetime vs m)   for cd = nat H2

the difference    (plot i)  divided by  (plot ii)


I assume you have the input nmbers for those plots already.



			Thanks
				Bernhard




*******************************************************************
Bernhard Lauss                 E-Mail: lauss@socrates.berkeley.edu
Physics Department
366 LeConte Hall
University of California @ Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94720                             Tel: (510)-642 4057
United States                                  Fax: (510)-642 9811
*******************************************************************

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Brendan Kiburg wrote:

> Dear Tom,
>
> > That is, when you say "impact parameter", are you referring to 'r' or
> > 'm'?
>
> I have been using 'm' as impact parameter.  Any plot called "r at
> decay" refers to 'r'.  Any plot called "impact at decay" refers to 'm'.
>
> This doesn't mean that everything is correct with the MC as previously
> presented.  There will be more plots forthcoming.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Brendan
>
>