[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Monte Carlo Data

To: Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: Monte Carlo Data
From: Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@mu03.npl.uiuc.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:27:34 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: Bernhard Lauss <lauss@berkeley.edu>, Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.56.0507281239330.6474@socrates.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-to: kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu
Sender: Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>

Dear Tom,

> That is, when you say "impact parameter", are you referring to 'r' or
> 'm'?  

I have been using 'm' as impact parameter.  Any plot called "r at
decay" refers to 'r'.  Any plot called "impact at decay" refers to 'm'.

This doesn't mean that everything is correct with the MC as previously
presented.  There will be more plots forthcoming.

Best regards,

Brendan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Monte Carlo Data
  - From: Bernhard Lauss <lauss@berkeley.edu>

References:
- Re: Monte Carlo Data
  - From: Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.berkeley.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Monte Carlo Data
Next by Date: Re: Monte Carlo Data
Previous by thread: Re: Monte Carlo Data
Next by thread: Re: Monte Carlo Data
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread