RE: unblinded MuCap result

["David W Hertzog" <hertzog@uiuc.edu>]

Peter,
	Small correction (to correction).  Bill explained that it was a
+2.8% shift (not 2.5%) and that 2.5% comes from the "usual"
semi-leptonic correction and the 0.4% is a revisited Goldman number
(slightly smaller) that they had looked into.  Well, at least that's my
memory of it.
	D

	Also, do you have a plot yet of the MuCap result versus
Lambda_OP ?  That would show a slight slope of course and would be most
representative of where we are now on a plot we have shown quite often.


	See you at the Pepe.

	d

-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Kammel [mailto:kammel@npl.uiuc.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 10:49 PM
To: Peter Kammel
Cc: Anatoliy Krivchitch; Tom Banks; Robert Carey; Steve Clayton; Ken
Crowe; Paul Debevec; Jules Deutsch; Stuart Freedman; Fred Gray; David
Hertzog; Malte Hildebrandt; Johny Egger; Brendan Kiburg; Sara Knaack;
Peter Kravtsov; Berhard Lauss; Maev Evgeny; omaev@cern.ch; Marat
Vznuzdaev; Francoise Mulhauser; Cenap Ozben; Claude Petitjean; G.E.
Petrov; R. Prieels; Semenchuk Gennadii; Tim Gorringe; Vladimir
Tishchenko; Alexandre Vasilyev; Alexei Vorobyov; Peter Winter; Jan
GOVAERTS
Subject: unblinded MuCap result

Dear friends,

It is our pleasure to send you the unblinded preliminary MuCap results
in
the attachment. Many thanks for your magnificent work, which made this
result possible.

Claude and Peter