[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MuSC inefficiency vs. run number
- To: Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.berkeley.edu>, Bernhard Lauss <lauss@berkeley.edu>, Claude Petitjean <claude.petitjean@psi.ch>, Steven Clayton <smclayto@uiuc.edu>, Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>, Fred Gray <fegray@berkeley.edu>, Tim Gorringe <gorringe@pa.uky.edu>, David Hertzog <hertzog@uiuc.edu>, Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>, Malte Hildebrandt <malte.hildebrandt@psi.ch>, Rene Prieels <R.Prieels@fynu.ucl.ac.be>, Francoise Mulhauser <Francoise.Mulhauser@psi.ch>, Peter Winter <peter.winter@psi.ch>, Sara Knaack <sknaack@uiuc.edu>
- Subject: MuSC inefficiency vs. run number
- From: Steven Clayton <smclayto@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:19:52 -0500
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
After the discussion of today, I added a
plot of "MuSC Inefficiency vs. Run Number"
to my teleconference page:
http://www.npl.uiuc.edu/exp/mucapture/coll/mucap/smclayto/TeleConf02Aug2006/teleconf.html
Run8 Prod50 mu- data is shown.
The plot looks similar to Tom's Figure 5 of
http://weak0.physics.berkeley.edu/weakint/research/muons/private/tbanks_dir/TeleConf/2005Jun28/2005Jun28.html
Regards,
Steven