Re: telconf next Tuesday (fwd)

[Steven Clayton <smclayto@npl.uiuc.edu>]

Hi Peter,

I do think the end of October is reasonable for a Run8
result.  I guess that makes me optimistic.  My goal is
still to complete an analysis report by the end of
August, before I go on vacation for 2 weeks.

Is your abstract deadline July 1 (the same as for
contributed talks)?

Steven

On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 12:13:39PM -0500, Peter Kammel wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> 
> I have to write my abstract for the DNP meeting soon.
> How optimistic/pessimistic are you conc the chances
> to present first results end October?
> 
> Best regards
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 18:08:32 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.berkeley.edu>
> To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: Re: telconf next Tuesday
> 
> 
> > We should have an analysis telconf next Tuesday.
> > On major item is the date of our box opening meeting.
> > The possible dates are the weekends around 9/16 or 9/23.
> > (Rene preferred 9/16 but did not completely exclude the later date).
> > As the travel needs to be arranged, we should decide pretty
> > soon. Personally, I have a preference for the date when both
> > Tom and Steve are confident to be ready and have submitted
> > their analysis report 2 weeks earlier to the collaboration. :)
> 
> Dear Peter,
> 
> I will be out of town Monday through Thursday, so I will not be able to
> participate in this week's teleconference.
> 
> Concerning the box opening date: either is acceptable to me.  I presume
> from your concluding emoticon that your last statement was
> tongue-in-cheek, so I will refrain from making any comments on the
> vagaries of research and data analysis and the uncertainty of meeting any
> fixed timetables therin.  As you have probably heard from Fred, we have
> lost 2 weeks already in our attempts to investigate the ePC and muPC
> effects on the fitted rates.  At this pace, and given that there are still
> several outstanding questions, I do not realistically believe that we will
> have the analysis wrapped things by mid-September.  Not impossible, but
> highly improbable.
> 
> Tom