[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: UIUC anlaysis status

To: Winter Peter <peter.winter@psi.ch>
Subject: Re: UIUC anlaysis status
From: Frederick Gray <fegray@berkeley.edu>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 15:34:16 -0700
Cc: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>, kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu
In-reply-to: <67F374811ED3544C8543E6C0EE5EAA4B173F1C@MAILBOX0B.psi.ch>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0605172010270.11453-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu> <67F374811ED3544C8543E6C0EE5EAA4B173F1C@MAILBOX0B.psi.ch>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

> The integration of the new FADCs for the TPC should be straight forward as soon as we have the decoding scheme of the raw data.

Hi, Peter,

It's almost exactly like the neutron detector FADC data.  The only difference
is that the clock is 25 MHz, and the timestamp should be divided by 2 (the 
least significant bit of the timestamp is always 0).

-- Fred

-- Fred Gray / Visiting Postdoctoral Researcher                 --
-- Department of Physics / University of California, Berkeley   --
-- fegray@berkeley.edu / phone 510-642-2438 / fax 510-643-8497  --

References:
- UIUC anlaysis status
  - From: "Winter Peter" <peter.winter@psi.ch>

Prev by Date: UIUC anlaysis status
Next by Date: [Fwd: Re: Meeting on COBRA fringe field problem]
Previous by thread: UIUC anlaysis status
Next by thread: [Fwd: Re: Meeting on COBRA fringe field problem]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread