[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
MuCap teleconf Tuesday May 16, 11:30-1PM CDT. 217-265-9888
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: MuCap teleconf Tuesday May 16, 11:30-1PM CDT. 217-265-9888
- From: Steven Clayton <smclayto@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 13:49:01 -0500
- Cc: analysis -- Tom Banks <tbanks@socrates.Berkeley.EDU>, Steve Clayton <smclayto@uiuc.edu>, Tim Gorringe <gorringe@pa.uky.edu>, Fred Gray <fegray@socrates.Berkeley.EDU>, David Hertzog <hertzog@uiuc.edu>, Malte Hildebrandt <malte.hildebrandt@psi.ch>, Brendan Kiburg <kiburg@npl.uiuc.edu>, Sara Knaack <sknaack@uiuc.edu>, Berhard Lauss <lauss@socrates.Berkeley.EDU>, Marat Vznuzdaev <marat@mail.pnpi.spb.ru>, Francoise Mulhauser <Francoise.Mulhauser@psi.ch>, Claude Petitjean <Claude.Petitjean@psi.ch>, "R. Prieels" <prieels@fynu.ucl.ac.be>, Peter Winter <peter.winter@psi.ch>, Alexandre Vasilyev <vassilie@mail.pnpi.spb.ru>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0605150948450.32524-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0605150948450.32524-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
The conference call is setup for Tuesday, May 16 from 11:30am-1pm
(Illinois time). The call in number is: 217-265-9888.
Steven
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 10:00:36AM -0500, Peter Kammel wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> Steve will send out the telconf number for tomorrow.
>
> We should discuss the impurity correction tomorrow. Maybe
> Bernhard could walk us through his latest conclusions.
>
> In this context we should also jointly discuss the best
> strategy for the present run. It is clear that we want to
> collect as many production mu- as possible. But we
> need 1.5-2 weeks for systematics. During 0.5-1 week we want
> to perform the nat H2 calibration. For the rest we
> have two options
>
> - mu+
> - humidity calibration
>
> I originally favored mu+ and wanted to perform a well
> prepared humidity calibration next year using the permeation
> tube and the CHUPS humidity generator. On Friday Bernhard
> called me and expressed his concern:
>
> It is this run where we will obtain by far our best mu-
> statistics. If impurities are a significant correction
> we should try to calibrate them now, not later, when
> conditions might have changed. He was even considering
> to purchase a $15000 absolute chilled mirror hygrometer
> for thsi run !
>
> Let's talk about that.
>
> Best regards
>
> Peter
>