[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wfd
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: wfd
- From: Tim Gorringe <gorringe@pa.uky.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:12:11 -0500
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511261642360.15635-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511261642360.15635-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050922 CentOS/1.7.12-1.4.1.centos4
Hi Peter,
I just wanted to confirm my understanding of the wfd channel
count. You have 4x14=60 channels instrumenting 60 of 64
gondola channels and need one additional wfd module to complete
this set-up. Also how many neutron counters are currently installed?
At present are simple TDC and ADC signals being recorded
for neutron triggers (and pre-scaled e/g triggers?).
Cheers, Tim.
Peter Kammel wrote:
>Dear Rob,
>
>Thus far 15 wfd are running fine, with occasional
>glitches. We would need to get another clock
>divider from MuLan for the last clock signal.
>I will leave this issue to Tim, who will
>certainly have a careful look at the wfd
>performance. Our extender board is in, and
>Genna is ready to make detailed studies
>with Tim, once he arrives on Thursday.
>
>We also are considering to use the wfd
>with our neutron detectors. The dynamic range
>of the neutron detectors would be set to 3.5-4 MeV.
>However, there would also be 10 times higher signals
>coming from Michel electrons running straight
>through the neutron detector.
>Is this dangerous for the wfd? We won't try that
>before getting your advice and ok on this issue.
>
>Many thanks
>
>Peter
>
>
>