[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eff
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: eff
- From: Steven Clayton <smclayto@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:36:36 -0600
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511130538400.10041-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511130538400.10041-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Hi Peter,
would you still like me to produce autocorrelations, or
is Bernhard's work sufficient?
Steven
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 05:40:49AM -0600, Peter Kammel wrote:
> Thanks Steve,
>
> Could you also look at the chamber auto correlations.
> We could still go higher with the HV, but I am
> worried that we will get a lot of afterpulses. I
> believe we did that in run 7 with ePC1 and the
> autocoreelations became really ugly.
>
> Best regards
>
> Peter
>