RE: MuCap

[Mulhauser Francoise <francoise.mulhauser@psi.ch>]

Dear Peter,

At first view, your idea sounds nice. However, if anything like that is
done, make sure that the survey group is taking the detector measurements
AFTER such a work. Therefore, you may reach some time conflict there about.

Best regards,
Francoise
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Winter
To: Peter Kammel; Fred Gray; Malte Hildebrandt; Francoise Mulhauser
Sent: 13/10/05 15:20
Subject: MuCap

Hi,

some things to mention (to whom it may concern)

- Adrian Gnädiger just proposed, that we could lift the MuCap detector 
by 60 mm instead of changing the rails. The advantage is that the rails 
can stay unchanged and the change of the detector height could be done 
next week without lifting it and then it needs no further action in the 
future. Question: Would such a change be possible or are there any 
restrictions? From the mechanical point of view Adrian and I think it is

but maybe for some other reasons we cannot do that. I think its a smart 
idea.

- I was not sure about the number of WFDs yesterday so I counted them 
today. At the moment the maximum number of WFDs at MuLan is 13 (not 15 
as we stated yesterday on the conference). With this the amount of wrong

channels is quite low! Just in case that this could change the 
calculation from yesterday.

- The TPC rails are with high probability NOT at the Hallendienst. Mr. 
Gnädiger said, that normally all the TPC stuff is put together on a car 
and brought to the east side.

Greetings
Peter

PS: 2 new gas bottles just arrived.