[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[4]: Humidity sensor
- To: Peter Kammel <kammel@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re[4]: Humidity sensor
- From: Peter Kravtsov <pkravt@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:54:53 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:reply-to:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qh2htDPpPC4+RXG0hw0pNOlua2EPcW6M43LhHdjJK4izvM78QSSMYr/ATBFm0+FCOd7VWUhFG9prPjUYtH2O63YVL7XVFCyxWH9SDs/gjQCic2zAtUgOGGYhmg+U/Fm0yDxSMMoU2VbmoMj6XtDxS+Qech0G9mAaV3g0E9aMlUc=
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0506271130310.31723-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- References: <1454706039.20050627182853@gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.21.0506271130310.31723-100000@one.npl.uiuc.edu>
- Reply-to: Peter Kravtsov <pkravt@gmail.com>
Hello Peter,
Our humidity graph is corrected to 17 bar pressure of course.
I took the saturation vapor pressure from reference book for
different temperatures, and fit this dependence.
The complete formula for calculating ppm from T_dewpoint is:
ppm = 10^(-43.42291 + 0.43575*T - 0.00149*T^2 + 0.00000188204*T^3)
This formula works for 10 bar hydrogen.
To correct the result for 17 bar, I simply divided it by 1.7.
Is it not right?
With regard to web page about CHUPS, we already have one in
our laboratory web site:
http://lkst.pnpi.nw.ru/hydrog/main.html
It is not updated by this visit results, but I'll do it as soon as
possible.
Best wishes,
Peter.
Monday, June 27, 2005, 6:41:05 PM, you wrote:
> Dear Peter,
> I just talked to Dave Alan from the PURA company and emailed
> your graph.
> - He was surprised by the large temp sensitivity and
> needs 24 hours to discuss with their techs. Dave said the
> sensor is calibrated at 21 C.
> - The response to a humidiy change is usually dominated
> by the surfaces and pipes before the sensor, not
> by the sensor itself. He will send us an article
> about the factors involved. I mentioned to him that
> be bypass the volume and directly sample the input
> flow, which is filtered and expected to be very dry.
> He will discuss this question also with his techs.
> - You plot the graph in humidity in ppm. Is that corrected
> for the 17 bar pressure of the system? How? Could
> you give us the dewpoints, you were reading during
> these measurments.
> We hope to have more information tomorrow.
> With best regards
> Peter
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Peter Kravtsov wrote:
>> Dear Peter,
>>
>> 1. Time between the temperature points is about 2 minutes.
>> (temperature rate is 1 degree per 2 minutes)
>>
>> 2. We measure 4-20 mA sensor signal with 301 Ohm resistor,
>> followed by a unity gain amplifier and 16-bit ADC with the
>> range of [+ - 10V]. This gives about 0.3mV resolution.
>> Total ADC error is about +- 2 LSB [+- 0.6 mV].
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Peter-the-second.
>>
>>
>>
>> Monday, June 27, 2005, 6:06:50 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > Dear Peter,
>>
>> > I will try to contact the company today.
>>
>> > Please give me a bit more details:
>> > - measurement time per temp point in your graph
>> > - current measurement, which resistor did you use?
>>
>> > Other relevant experimental details which might help.
>>
>> > Best regards
>>
>> > Peter
>>
--
Best regards,
Peter mailto:pkravt@gmail.com